--------------American School in Japan -----------------ASIJ Teachers' Union---Protecting Our Rights

Age Discrimination -- May 2002
Home
Previous Home Page
Letter to Board November 29, 2004
Letter to Board (proposal) May 27, 2004
5th Arbitration --May 20, 2004
4th Arbitration -- April 20, 2004
3rd Arbitration--March 8, 2004
Q & A from March 8 Arbitration
Letter to the Board--January 2004
History of Situation to Board--January 2004
Comments from Former Administrators--posted Jan 2004
Unofficial Viewpoint of the Board--June 2003
Concerns to the Board June 2003
4th DANKO -- Feb 27, 2003
Jan 25 Reply to our questions of Dec 15 -- Updated February 2003
3rd DANKO - November 2002
2nd DANKO--September 2002
1st DANKO-- May 2002
Examples of Past Practice -- March 2003
Our Concerns --May 2002
History of the Situation -- Updated April 2005
Letter of Agreement--April 27, 2005
Letter to Board President, April 2, 2005
Retirement Policies at ASIJ
We Get Letters -- Updated February 2003
Letters written by Union Members -- September 2002
Age Discrimination -- May 2002
FSCC Final Statement on This Issue -- May 2002
Union letter to School -- April 2002
Letters to Faculty/Staff -- April 2002
Letter sent to the Board -- March 2002
Some ASIJ Teacher Statistics (Some 2002 hires not included) -- May 2002
ASIJ Policies with adoption and revision dates -- May 2002
Information About the Union -- May 2002
Laws of Japan -- March 2003

Some thoughts on Age Discrimination  (web sites at bottom)
 

From Jeffrey Bernbach's book, Job Discrimination 2, (page 10): When a person loses a job, is denied a promotion, is sexually harassed, or is relegated to a lesser post because of age, sex, race, religion, ethnicity, or a physical handicap or illness, the emotional consequences often far exceed any financial losses--emotional distress must never be taken lightly. 
 
Fear of employer invincibility is cited most frequently as the reason for not pursuing an employment discrimination claim.  Incredibly, it is probably the greatest of all misconceptions. (Page 123)

From the book, Age Discrimination in the American Workplace, by Raymond Gregory. 

P. 22  Since the enactment of the ADEA, the Supreme Court in its decisions relating to age discrimination has repeatedly affirmed that it is the very essence of age discrimination for an older employee to be fired because the employer believes that productivity and competence decline with age.

Federal Court of Appeals Judge Richard Posner has written:  To some, age stereotyping is every bit as vicious as racial stereotyping.

P. 24  Little evidence exists to support age stereotypes.  The Commonwealth Fund report (1990) revealed no correlation between age and ability to perform, except in those jobs demanding strenuous physical labor.

P. 25  The Wirtz (former Labor Secretary) report found that 70 percent of those employers who set age limits for hiring did so without having any data to support a need for age limits.   Given the disinclination of employers to investigate the facts or to reexamine the accuracy of their assumptions about older workers, it is not surprising that workplace decisions continue to be based on false data.
 
From a 1987 ruling from the US Court of Appeals Chicago:  The justices wrote: Congress enacted the ADEA precisely because many employers and younger business executives act as if they believe that there are good business reasons for discriminating against older employees.  Retention of senior employees who can be replaced by younger, lower paid persons frequently competes with other values, such as profits or concepts of economic efficiency.  The ADEA represents a choice among these values.  It [ADEA] stands for the proposition that this is a better country for its willingness to pay the costs for treating older persons fairly.
 
Of course, ASIJ is located in Japan but we are the American School in Japan.  The US Age Discrimination in Employment Act states:  SEC. 623. [Section 4](a) It shall be unlawful for an employer- (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's age;

ASIJ does have an incorporated part in the US (Friends of the American School), they receive Federal money to attend TIES, ("For the past ten years we have received a small grant from the US State Department to support attendance by ASIJ teachers and administrators at the annual conference sponsored by Technology and Information Educational Service of Minnesota." P. Cooper memo October, 2001), and possibly other grants.  The US law states:  Section 6102.  Prohibition of discrimination:  Pursuant to regulations prescribed under section 6103 of this title, and except as provided by section 6103(b) of this title and section 6103(c) of this title, no person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

"Top management should publish a resolution that no one will lose his job for contribution to quality and productivity."  --W. Edwards Deming (In 1960, awarded the Secord Order Medal of the Sacred Treasure by the Emperor of Japan and, in 1987,  the National Medal of Technology by President Reagan.)
 

 

Association for the Advancement of Retired Persons

National Employee Rights Institute

Cornell Law School

Age Discrimination in Employment Act 1967

US Government facts

Nolo -- Law for All

--------------American School in Japan -----------------ASIJ Teachers' Union---Protecting Our Rights