--------------American School in Japan -----------------ASIJ Teachers' Union---Protecting Our Rights

4th Arbitration -- April 20, 2004
Home
Previous Home Page
Letter to Board November 29, 2004
Letter to Board (proposal) May 27, 2004
5th Arbitration --May 20, 2004
4th Arbitration -- April 20, 2004
3rd Arbitration--March 8, 2004
Q & A from March 8 Arbitration
Letter to the Board--January 2004
History of Situation to Board--January 2004
Comments from Former Administrators--posted Jan 2004
Unofficial Viewpoint of the Board--June 2003
Concerns to the Board June 2003
4th DANKO -- Feb 27, 2003
Jan 25 Reply to our questions of Dec 15 -- Updated February 2003
3rd DANKO - November 2002
2nd DANKO--September 2002
1st DANKO-- May 2002
Examples of Past Practice -- March 2003
Our Concerns --May 2002
History of the Situation -- Updated April 2005
Letter of Agreement--April 27, 2005
Letter to Board President, April 2, 2005
Retirement Policies at ASIJ
We Get Letters -- Updated February 2003
Letters written by Union Members -- September 2002
Age Discrimination -- May 2002
FSCC Final Statement on This Issue -- May 2002
Union letter to School -- April 2002
Letters to Faculty/Staff -- April 2002
Letter sent to the Board -- March 2002
Some ASIJ Teacher Statistics (Some 2002 hires not included) -- May 2002
ASIJ Policies with adoption and revision dates -- May 2002
Information About the Union -- May 2002
Laws of Japan -- March 2003

There was a recording made (Japanese).  The following is taken from our History of the Situation page.
 
 
 
Our 4th arbitration meeting was held April 20 in Shinjuku.  In answer to questions concerning the number of people in the past who had not been granted waivers after reaching 60, the Admin team stated that 13 people over the past 10 years had not been extended.   

They also stated that the 6 people contesting this policy are the same six listed as examples of past practice of not being rehired at 60 and those same six are included in the 13 total who have not been extended in the past 10 years.

They also do not dispute that most of those not extended were well beyond 60 years old even to 67 and 69--and they had often been extended many years.  Three people were even hired after 60. 
 
They also agreed that there has been no past practice of a person not being extended with a regular contract solely because they were 60.

In discussing issues concerning co-curricular assignments and the length of the teaching day listed on the Non-Regular Contract, the Admin were made aware that we do not all teach only 5 of 8 classes (HS, MS, ES, and ELC are all different) and therefore do not have lots of time to meet with students during school rather than after school, that PE teachers MUST coach two sports and that teachers do not ultimately have free choice on co-curricular activities.  This was pointed out since the Non-Regular contract "allows" a teacher to leave at 3:15.

It was also clearly pointed out that when the Union talks about the "old" retirement policy, we always mean the 1964-2001 policy under which we were all hired and signed numerous contracts.  The Admin team refers to the "old" policy as the 2002 step 5 upon rehiring policy.

In the four danko's and 4 arbitration meetings the admin team has variously been headed by Tim Thornton, Tim Ilse, the lawyers and this time it was Noda-san.  Never a Board President nor Headmaster who is in charge.  It is very difficult to have dialogue with so many different heads.  Our representative, Mr. Fukuyama, has always been our spokesperson. 

Next arbitration date is May 17 from 9-12 at Shinjuku.